Letter: Any new community centre must include the arts

In preparation for the upcoming municipal elections, I read with great interest your articles outlining the candidates’ positions on the proposed Omischl building and its location for a new arena, recreation and community centre in North Bay.

See: Which mayoralty candidates support new Recreational Centre at Omischl?

And: Which council candidates support/oppose the new rec centre/rink?

All pertinent issues aside — such as construction costs, design, sustainability costs, and location — I couldn’t help but notice there has been little if any mention of usage for recreational activities beyond the realm of sports. As a former teacher with many years of experience in the field of recreational programming behind me, I must question the direction of this proposed structure.

See also: Opinion: Build new arena...and then what?

Will it be only sports-focused? I noticed the word “culture” mentioned once or twice in the candidates’ responses to the question, “Do you support this new facility?” There was no descriptive reference given beyond that term. I firmly believe that the term “recreation” encompasses so much more: music, dance, visual arts, and drama — and all add to the "well-roundedness" of our children and their families.

Further, I noticed that Dreamcoat Fantasy Theatre is seeking a new location. As well, the North Bay Art Association needs a location to meet, and hold workshops and exhibitions. I am certain there are many other not-for-profit cultural organizations that would like to see their needs met at this new facility. Could this proposed structure consider recreational needs beyond sports?

Yes, my personal interests encompass the arts but I am no stranger to hockey. Both my parents’ careers were based in arena management and community recreational programs in northern Ontario. In fact, my father, Harold Ribson fostered, promoted and coached women’s hockey in both northern and southern Ontario. So, I challenge our candidates to step up to the plate and broaden their focus. Wherever their sympathies lie: simple plan, designer plan, cost-effectiveness or preferred location, please investigate a wider view of the purpose for a new complex and a supportive structure for inclusivity.

Kindest regards,

Denise Ribson