To the editor:
I hear the chief's reasoning in this matter, but you must realize the uproar, given it is one governed strictly by legal restrictions and not the Canadian spirit which is always prepared to go beyond the normal. In this case, a beautiful Golden Lab was sacrificed by the decision of the chief.
I wonder what resources could have been utilized.
They talk of small boats and a canoe being available. Is it illegal to be put out on the ice even if tethered to the fire truck? How would they do a body recovery, if a person clearly drowned? This dog's body was pulled out several minutes after it succumbed to the freezing water. Obviously, the water was not moving that fast, or else the body would have been far downstream under the ice.
In this case, a prized animal was asking for help. An animal that would have sacrificed his life, as they always do, in times of distress. Normal gutsy Canadians would have made, or at least attempted a rescue.
Are you also implying that if a person, or infant were to wander on the ice and get into this situation, the rescue force would just mill around and watch this person possibly go through and drown?
Moving waters, freezing waters, and thin ice, etc., etc . are risks essentially in all of Ontario, Canada, and North America. All resources and procedures to execute a rescue should have been thought out and equipped for generations ago. I cannot imagine this non-intervention rule being the governing law in any other jurisdiction.
In this case, light boats and I’m sure survival floatation vests plus rope, ladders, warming facilities, etc should have been readily available…..and if not, shame to all concerned.
The chief and those men around him could have shown leadership, a little courage, and take appropriate action to do a rescue.
I feel for the owners of the dog. Their loss is very tragic, probably unnecessary, and very sad.
Phil Thompson
Orillia.
