Skip to content

Many prevailing societal attitudes justify, tolerate, normalize and minimize sexual violence against women and girls.

The credibility of victim-survivors is frequently questioned when reporting sexual assault
opinion AdobeStock_66405834 2017

By Brenda Quenneville, Executive Director,  Amelia Rising Sexual Assault Centre of Nipissing.

-----

In July of 2016, the public saw a conviction for sexual assault in the R v Ururyar case in the Canadian criminal justice system. In a public statement at that time, complainant Mandi Gray (R v Ururyar), who waived a publication ban on her name, remarked upon the 18-month endeavour:

“I am tired of people talking to me like I won some sort of rape lottery because the legal system did what it is supposed to [that is, Ontario Court Justice Marvin Zuker announced a guilty verdict],” Gray said in response. “If we are told to be grateful for receiving the bare minimum, and that we should simply allow for social institutions to further…violate our rights, I am incredibly concerned.

Aligning with Gray’s comments, days after the conviction, Ururyar’s defence team appealed the conviction and asked for bail, which was granted.

Last week Ontario Superior Justice Michael Dambrot said the original trial judge's assessment of Mustafa Ururyar's evidence appeared coloured by "rape literature", and ordered new trial for Ururyar.

Justice Dambrot’s suggestion that academic texts on rape introduced in the original case may have fostered “pernicious assumptions about men and their tendency to rape” is unmerited. Amelia Rising Sexual Assault Centre of Nipissing affirms that much evidence exists on both the systemic and gendered nature of sexual violence around the world, as well as well-documented study into traumatic impacts of sexual violation upon victims. For example:

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) notes that many prevailing societal attitudes justify, tolerate, normalize and minimize sexual violence against women and girls. As a consequence, prevalence and common misconceptions of sexualized violence reflects these patterns, and it remains a crime clearly differentiated by gender and other elements of social location.
  • In a 2004 report, males made up 29% of child victims, 12% of youth victims and 8% of adult victims.For males, being under 12 years old heightens their vulnerability to being targeted for sexual offences. The remaining percentages of victims, respectively in the above (71%, 82% and 92%), are women and girls 
  • Most incidences of sexual coercion fall outside of clear physical evidence of sexualized crime. Instead, coercion fosters or exploits existing social contexts that are commonly physically invisible, such as social contexts and consequences: sexual violence targets are commonly “ashamed or embarrassed, or want to avoid incrimination of people they know.”
  • The World Health Organization notes that sexual victimization can lead to health outcomes such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress; as well as negative behavioral outcomes.

Data like the above has been collected and vetted over many decades by reputable researchers, including the World Health Organization, Statistics Canada and numerous individual trauma scholars from all walks of life.

All this flies in the face of Gray’s efforts of reporting, testifying and engaging experts in her case —and Zuker’s verdict.  As rape-survivor advocates, we are not surprised by these developments in the R v Ururyar case.  Nor do we believe that the appeal of the case, nor the granting of the offender’s bail, suggest any indication of his innocence.  Justice Zuker found Gray “very credible and trustworthy”, while Ururyar’s version of what happened was noted as “a fabrication, credible never.”

On the contrary, we see this – appeal of sexual assault conviction by the offender, and little to no jail time − as an example of why sexual assault prevalence remains high, yet reporting remains low in Canada.  The drudgery, disappointment and implicit victim-blaming that survivor-victims are exposed to within the criminal justice system is often relentless. As example:

  • The credibility of victim-survivors is frequently questioned when reporting sexual assault. The Canadian criminal justice system − a system based largely on verbal testimony, physical evidence, and the credibility of the complainant − commonly proves less accessible to those assaulted by an offender that is known to them or in historical cases (the majority of cases)
  • Overall, conviction rates are very low, which de-validates the experiences of survivors; and works to suggest that sexual assault is a commonly-falsified or rare crime
  • Too often, a “victims’ apparent lack of resistance becomes the focus of assessment and intervention” in court and other reporting procedures. This is an unsuitable approach to understanding and substantiating sexual violence
  • According to Canadian research, 33 out of every 1,000 sexual assault cases are reported to the police, and just 29 are recorded as a crime.  These numbers speak volumes about how many assailants actually walk free—and why victims think twice about pressing charges.

We too hear these experiences reflected back to us, in communities across Ontario by countless survivors of sexual violence. We hear from them every day at Sexual Assault Centres and on our crisis lines.

If something has happened to you, there are people who will believe and support you.  You can talk to a trusted friend, family member, or contact a sexual assault centre support line.  If you are considering reporting, we can help you think through your options.  If you are not considering reporting, that’s okay too.  You can access a sexual assault centre in our community by contacting Amelia Rising’s crisis line at (705) 476-3355.

If you are a friend or family member of someone who is dealing with sexual violence, there are things you can do too.  You can be an ally to the person who is victimized, instead of the accused. You can listen to the person’s story without judgement, scrutiny or expectations that they formally report.  You can help them to find safe places to seek additional support, if needed, too.

“The myths of rape should be dispelled once and for all,” Justice Zuker said in his ruling. “It doesn't matter if the victim was drinking, out at night alone, sexually exploited, on a date with the perpetrator, or how the victim was dressed. No one asks to be raped.. 

Our justice systems need to do their part to better support our communities to remember just this.

Brenda Quenneville, 

Executive Director

Amelia Rising Sexual Assault Centre of Nipissing